Sahih al-Bukhari Hadith 4665

There was a disagreement between them (i.e. Ibn `Abbas رضی اللہ عنہما and Ibn Az-Zubair رضی اللہ عنہم) so I went to Ibn `Abbas رضی اللہ عنہما in the morning and said (to him), "Do you want to fight against Ibn Zubair and thus make lawful what Allah has made unlawful (i.e. fighting in Meccas?" Ibn `Abbas رضی اللہ عنہما said, "Allah forbid! Allah ordained that Ibn Zubair and Bani Umaiya would permit (fighting in Mecca), but by Allah, I will never regard it as permissible." Ibn `Abbas رضی اللہ عنہما added. "The people asked me to take the oath of allegiance to Ibn Az-Zubair. I said, 'He is really entitled to assume authority for his father, Az-Zubair was the helper of the Prophet, his (maternal) grandfather, Abu Bakr رضی اللہ عنہ was (the Prophet's) companion in the cave, his mother, Asma' رضی اللہ عنہا was 'Dhatun-Nitaq', his aunt, `Aisha رضی اللہ عنہا was the mother of the Believers, his paternal aunt, Khadija رضی اللہ عنہا was the wife of the Prophet (ﷺ) , and the paternal aunt of the Prophet (ﷺ) was his grandmother. He himself is pious and chaste in Islam, well versed in the Knowledge of the Qur'an. By Allah! (Really, I left my relatives, Bani Umaiya for his sake though) they are my close relatives, and if they should be my rulers, they are equally apt to be so and are descended from a noble family. But he (Hadrat Abdullah bin Zubair رضی اللہ عنہما ) preferred Tuwaitat, Osamat and Homaidat to us, by which he meant the branches of Bani Asad namely: Bani Tuwait, bani Osamah and Bani Asad as well. Isn't it a thing worth-considering that Ibn-e-Abi Aas i.e. Abdul Malik bin Merwan is challenging and resolutely advancing but Hadrat Abdullah bin Zubair رضی اللہ عنہما is not reacting to his aggression?